Axis & Allies ForuMINI Forum Index Axis & Allies ForuMINI
The largest forum on the Web specialised in the Axis & Allies miniatures and War At Sea games
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)  
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Axis & Allies ForuMINI Forum Index

AAM normal AAM disrupted AAM crackshot WAS normal WAS crippled WAS Torpedo
The probability of at least successes with dice is %
The AAM/WAS calculator works only if you are LOGGED IN and have JAVASCRIPT enabled. Known bug: doesn't work for more successes than dice

Soviet Surface Combatants
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Axis & Allies ForuMINI Forum Index -> WAS Custom Cards & House Rules
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Mad Ghost/0331
.
.

Silver-Rated Trader

Joined: 28 Dec 2007
Posts: 1861

Location: Mundelein, IL (North of Chicago)

PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 6:35 pm    Post subject: Soviet Surface Combatants Reply with quote

Destroyer Leader Tashkent



thoughts?


_________________


An appeal to fear never finds an echo in German hearts.
Otto von Bismarck

http://riversidegaming.myfastforum.org/forum3.php
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiornu
Naval Historian
Naval Historian
Moderator


Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 664


PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 6:40 pm    Post subject: Re: Soviet Surface Combatants Reply with quote

"Lose"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mad Ghost/0331
.
.

Silver-Rated Trader

Joined: 28 Dec 2007
Posts: 1861

Location: Mundelein, IL (North of Chicago)

PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 7:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Expletive
_________________


An appeal to fear never finds an echo in German hearts.
Otto von Bismarck

http://riversidegaming.myfastforum.org/forum3.php
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeuralDream

Away for a day. See you Wednesday morning.


Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 5585

Location: London, UK

PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 7:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yup. Apart from the spelling mistake, it looks good. I wouldn't use the uniquely tough ability, because I dislike it, but that's just me. Also, maybe it qualifies for a fifth torpedo. Maybe not.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mad Ghost/0331
.
.

Silver-Rated Trader

Joined: 28 Dec 2007
Posts: 1861

Location: Mundelein, IL (North of Chicago)

PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 7:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

how about the stats?
_________________


An appeal to fear never finds an echo in German hearts.
Otto von Bismarck

http://riversidegaming.myfastforum.org/forum3.php
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeuralDream

Away for a day. See you Wednesday morning.


Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 5585

Location: London, UK

PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 7:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe Destroyer Leader instead of Flotilla Leader, where the destroyers get some different bonus or the flag bonus is limited to +2. I think something is needed to differentiate this destroyer leader to the flotilla leader cruisers.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WarHighlander



Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 80

Location: Sacramento, CA

PostPosted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Switch Main Guns to 5/5/4

Armor 2/8/2

ASW 4 (Which you seem to have completely forgotten)

Add High Speed Run

9 points is fine.

Delete other special rules. Flotilla Leader too powerful for a Destoyer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
NeuralDream

Away for a day. See you Wednesday morning.


Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 5585

Location: London, UK

PostPosted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 1:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are you sure she had depth charges, Highlander?

You are right about High-speed run.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiornu
Naval Historian
Naval Historian
Moderator


Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 664


PostPosted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 2:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

She had depth charges on the centerline between the mine rails. No active sonar.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RAEVSKI
.
.
SOCCEROO FEVER


Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Posts: 2796

Location: BRISBANE AUSTRALIA

PostPosted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 2:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hooray a a target for the Black sea fleet.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mad Ghost/0331
.
.

Silver-Rated Trader

Joined: 28 Dec 2007
Posts: 1861

Location: Mundelein, IL (North of Chicago)

PostPosted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tiornu wrote:
She had depth charges on the centerline between the mine rails. No active sonar.


should she have an ASW rating if she has no sonar? how effective can she be at hunting subs?

and she has to have something for the destroyer leader part of her design.
_________________


An appeal to fear never finds an echo in German hearts.
Otto von Bismarck

http://riversidegaming.myfastforum.org/forum3.php
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeuralDream

Away for a day. See you Wednesday morning.


Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 5585

Location: London, UK

PostPosted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 2:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I never managed to find a satisfactory representation of Destroyer leaders. That's why there is no destroyer leader in the forumini navies. I had left it for future work.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiornu
Naval Historian
Naval Historian
Moderator


Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 664


PostPosted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 2:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
how effective can she be at hunting subs?

There were lots of ships used in ASW that lacked active sonar and got by with hydrophones only. I have not seen a study quantifying the difference.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mad Ghost/0331
.
.

Silver-Rated Trader

Joined: 28 Dec 2007
Posts: 1861

Location: Mundelein, IL (North of Chicago)

PostPosted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NeuralDream wrote:
I never managed to find a satisfactory representation of Destroyer leaders. That's why there is no destroyer leader in the forumini navies. I had left it for future work.


the future is now!!


how about adding a torpedo die or two... or increasing torpedo range, like a range 3 torpedo.... just throwing ideas out there.
_________________


An appeal to fear never finds an echo in German hearts.
Otto von Bismarck

http://riversidegaming.myfastforum.org/forum3.php
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WarHighlander



Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 80

Location: Sacramento, CA

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Soviet destroyer torpedos didn't have a particularly long range in WWII.

533 mm (21") 53-39
10,940 yards (10,000 m) / 34.0 knots


While the French destroyers like the Le Terrible had:

55 cm (21.65") 23DT, Toulon
14,200 yards (13,000 m) / 35 knots
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
WarHighlander



Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 80

Location: Sacramento, CA

PostPosted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 12:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You could drop it down to ASW 3, but then it would probably need to be lowered to 8 points if you incorporate the other changes I suggested.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
RAEVSKI
.
.
SOCCEROO FEVER


Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Posts: 2796

Location: BRISBANE AUSTRALIA

PostPosted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 12:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tiornu wrote:
Quote:
how effective can she be at hunting subs?

There were lots of ships used in ASW that lacked active sonar and got by with hydrophones only. I have not seen a study quantifying the difference.

Axis subs in the Black sea were really not under much threat. Soviet ASW was not good.
I would go ASW 2 or 3 at most. Remembering that all subs in the Black sea were coastal Hull 1 types.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mad Ghost/0331
.
.

Silver-Rated Trader

Joined: 28 Dec 2007
Posts: 1861

Location: Mundelein, IL (North of Chicago)

PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 12:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

how do we feel about this one?



I am not totaly in love with not recognizing the amount of punishment she sustained, but...
_________________


An appeal to fear never finds an echo in German hearts.
Otto von Bismarck

http://riversidegaming.myfastforum.org/forum3.php
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
swarbs
.
.
Nothing but Rum, Sodomy, and the Lash.


Joined: 23 Dec 2007


Posts: 3534


PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 12:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How about making your destroyer leader SA into a surface equivalent of wolfpack, "If you control 2 or more destroyers, each destroyer gets +1 die when making torpedo attacks." or something like "Each local or adjacent destroyer at the end of the movement phase gains +1 die to torpedo attacks."

It makes more sense to me that a flotilla leader would make each destroyer around it a little better, rather than having it's escorts make it a little better.  Plus, 5 is a lot of destroyer torpedoes.

There are always other choices for sa's about resiliency too: survivor, determination, damage control.  Speaking of options, there are plenty for speed too: lead the attack, flank speed.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mad Ghost/0331
.
.

Silver-Rated Trader

Joined: 28 Dec 2007
Posts: 1861

Location: Mundelein, IL (North of Chicago)

PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

swarbs wrote:
How about making your destroyer leader SA into a surface equivalent of wolfpack, "If you control 2 or more destroyers, each destroyer gets +1 die when making torpedo attacks." or something like "Each local or adjacent destroyer at the end of the movement phase gains +1 die to torpedo attacks."

It makes more sense to me that a flotilla leader would make each destroyer around it a little better, rather than having it's escorts make it a little better.  Plus, 5 is a lot of destroyer torpedoes.



I had ment for it to read as the die gain is one per ship, for a maximum of three ships, in other words, three ships would each gain one die.

Is that what you ment as well?

swarbs wrote:
There are always other choices for sa's about resiliency too: survivor, determination, damage control.  Speaking of options, there are plenty for speed too: lead the attack, flank speed.


could you sugest a specific SA for both cases?
_________________


An appeal to fear never finds an echo in German hearts.
Otto von Bismarck

http://riversidegaming.myfastforum.org/forum3.php
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Axis & Allies ForuMINI Forum Index -> WAS Custom Cards & House Rules All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Current Time
Announcements
Editor's Choice
WAS Modeling Contest (Sponsored by Riverside Gaming)
War at Sea Gallery
AAM Eastern Front Gallery
AAM HHRCz cards
Forumini Admirals
All War At Sea Cards
All AAM cards
Random Image
Friends
Official WoTC website
Richard Baker's Blog
Le Forum de A&ANM
Axis&Allies.org
Riverside Gaming
Le Forum de Blackguard
Miniature Trading
WaS Historical Tournament
Top posters
packertim 9350
Okie 4357
swarbs 3534
Duck Crusader 2981
RAEVSKI 2796
DaJudge 2589
jfkziegler 2584
Jesse_James 2404
IJN Fuso 2189
The_lucky_Y 2154

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum