|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
weedsrock2 .


AHF Bronze-Rated Trader
Joined: 23 Dec 2007 Posts: 1147
 Location: IA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 3:50 am Post subject: Playing with RB's new experimental night rules |
|
|
Our gaming club had 12 people show up for our monthly WaS game night last Friday. Wow! We had pre-announced that the games would be using RB's new experimental night rules. So we played a total of about 14 games using those rules. Plus at least one player playtested in advance. Overall, they worked pretty well but there were a few glitches.
The biggest 'glitch' was predetermining that we were going to use darkness rules. Because we knew darkness rules were in effect we all came with builds optimized for that. But in RB's rules we should technically have rolled a dice to determine if darkness rules were in effect. That allowed a few things to become pretty serious 'cheese.' We also restricted the (200 pt) games to the European theater which also had a bad side effect.
The biggest problem was the Sparviero. By knowing in advance that night rules were in effect and by restricting to the European theatre there was really no effective counter-balance to these bombers. Fighters are almost useless because they rarely 'find' the target and also crash on landing (a few people tried it) so the only counter is ship-based AA, and that is hobbled by a -1. Add that to the Sparviero's 5 armor and they ran wild and free all over the game and were virtually impossible to stop.
If we had used the 'roll a dice to determine night rules' there probably would have been more 'hedging' in fleet builds to have more aircraft in the builds, but with the ability to swap out 25% of your points it is still likely the Sparviero's would rule the game. I also tried a couple of Halifax's. They did about the same as day rules since they already only hit on 6's (which is to say mediocre), but they are also almost impossible to shoot down. They also can't attack destroyers or PT boats (see next).
One thing that is probably an 'accurate' and positive change is the utility of MTB/PT boats. They are harder to hit at distance, and their torpedo attacks are not affected 'in sector' so they get a better chance to do some damage. Almost everyone brought MTB/PT's in their builds.
Overall, the surface gunnery rules seem to work fine, but I think the aircraft rules still need some work. Patrol bombers are too powerful and almost impossible to shoot down, or even abort. One possibility is to require patrol bombers to also do a 'search check' to tone them down. They could still land without a recovery check. Or maybe patrol bombers only fail a search check or recovery check on a '1'? Or maybe Sparviero's shouldn't be able to operate with night rules! 
_________________
The IJN Carrier Liberation Force - "Because We Care"
Join the IJNCVLF. Service Guarantees Citizenship! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RAEVSKI .
 SOCCEROO FEVER
Joined: 16 Jan 2008 Posts: 2791
 Location: BRISBANE AUSTRALIA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
COOL these rules will be in play fore the ultimate dream campaggn _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
swarbs .
 Nothing but Rum, Sodomy, and the Lash.
Joined: 23 Dec 2007

 Posts: 3529

|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't get to play my axis build that night and it included the lame establish screen and lead the attack combo. I think it could have been much more effective at night than in the day. Aircraft are almost removed as a threat and there is no ER, so only the battleships that had been lined up to defend that objective would be able to shoot them, plus they'd have a -1 on gunnery making a vital hit less likely.
Cruisers are much more effective because at night, like DD's, they are protected over range three against BB guns, so I think points spent on cruiser SA's like flotilla and cruiser leader, or the above combo were better values at night than in the day. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
weedsrock2 .


AHF Bronze-Rated Trader
Joined: 23 Dec 2007 Posts: 1147
 Location: IA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| swarbs wrote: | I didn't get to play my axis build that night and it included the lame establish screen and lead the attack combo. I think it could have been much more effective at night than in the day. Aircraft are almost removed as a threat and there is no ER, so only the battleships that had been lined up to defend that objective would be able to shoot them, plus they'd have a -1 on gunnery making a vital hit less likely.
Cruisers are much more effective because at night, like DD's, they are protected over range three against BB guns, so I think points spent on cruiser SA's like flotilla and cruiser leader, or the above combo were better values at night than in the day. |
I plead ignorance. What is the 'establish screen and lead the attack combo?' _________________
The IJN Carrier Liberation Force - "Because We Care"
Join the IJNCVLF. Service Guarantees Citizenship! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
doganpc
 AHF Bronze-Rated Trader
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 243

|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| weedsrock2 wrote: | | swarbs wrote: | I didn't get to play my axis build that night and it included the lame establish screen and lead the attack combo. I think it could have been much more effective at night than in the day. Aircraft are almost removed as a threat and there is no ER, so only the battleships that had been lined up to defend that objective would be able to shoot them, plus they'd have a -1 on gunnery making a vital hit less likely.
Cruisers are much more effective because at night, like DD's, they are protected over range three against BB guns, so I think points spent on cruiser SA's like flotilla and cruiser leader, or the above combo were better values at night than in the day. |
I plead ignorance. What is the 'establish screen and lead the attack combo?' |
(opinion biased)
A horrible ruling probably made by someone unfamiliar with the naval miniature game that allows for the Eugenio with its establish screen to work in conjunction with the Koln and its Lead the attack. The combo puts a Koln within 2 sectors of objectives before movement begins. Usually deployed in three's as an all or nothing approach to winning the standard tournament styled game.
(/opinion biased)
Dogan
Who am I kidding, everything I say is always biased. _________________
Bella Corazzata! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
weedsrock2 .


AHF Bronze-Rated Trader
Joined: 23 Dec 2007 Posts: 1147
 Location: IA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| doganpc wrote: | | weedsrock2 wrote: | | swarbs wrote: | I didn't get to play my axis build that night and it included the lame establish screen and lead the attack combo. I think it could have been much more effective at night than in the day. Aircraft are almost removed as a threat and there is no ER, so only the battleships that had been lined up to defend that objective would be able to shoot them, plus they'd have a -1 on gunnery making a vital hit less likely.
Cruisers are much more effective because at night, like DD's, they are protected over range three against BB guns, so I think points spent on cruiser SA's like flotilla and cruiser leader, or the above combo were better values at night than in the day. |
I plead ignorance. What is the 'establish screen and lead the attack combo?' |
(opinion biased)
A horrible ruling probably made by someone unfamiliar with the naval miniature game that allows for the Eugenio with its establish screen to work in conjunction with the Koln and its Lead the attack. The combo puts a Koln within 2 sectors of objectives before movement begins. Usually deployed in three's as an all or nothing approach to winning the standard tournament styled game.
(/opinion biased)
Dogan
Who am I kidding, everything I say is always biased. |
Ah! I forgot about that one. I am glad he didn't get a chance to play it last Friday. Especially against me!
Even so, that is a great point. That would be yet another uber 'cheese' move with night rules. _________________
The IJN Carrier Liberation Force - "Because We Care"
Join the IJNCVLF. Service Guarantees Citizenship! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RTBS

Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 16
 Location: Iowa
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Weedsrock - As we play historical limits, there's only one Eugenio I believe, so only one Koln can reach an objective on first turn. In our games anyway. Still, it would have been interesting to see how well it would have worked at night. If you had S-Boats to deny one objective, could use a Koln to get one on first turn. Then your opponent would pretty much be fighting for his life over the last one.
My Axis fleet had a flotilla leader bonus and plenty of destroyers. As most folk brought Battleships and very few of the Non-US Allied ships have a flag bonus, I had initiative very time in every game I played. And being able to get those destroyers in close against the BBs to use the Valiant Stand SA of the Ludeman's was nice. And I found having initiative every time made it easier to put my U-boats where I could do the most damage.
I would agree though that the Patrol Bombers are too powerful. I did not bring Sparvs, but I think you'd agree with me that even the Kondors were too powerful. I was able to fly two every turn, got four rocket attacks during the game, was able to harrass any sub I wanted pretty much, and as pinpointers for my U-Boats, I was rolling a lot of torpedoes. There were no penalties (except for ASW) and the only guy I played out of three games who had anything that could counter them ended up losing 2 of his three fighters and only got to attack one Kondor once (he only aborted).
In retrospect, my Axis build was probably of the "Cheesy" variety you refer to. Oh well. Playing the "It might be dark, it might not be dark" rule would probably eliminate that. At least from the Kondor side of things as they don't defend well against fighters. The Sparvs though, as you mention, would still be an issue. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cealigh "the MadSco
 I AM the Mad Scot! None are my equal! Many are my betters!

Joined: 01 Mar 2008 Posts: 838
 Location: Arizona not near any water other than my sink,tub,shower,pool, toilet.
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:07 am Post subject: Re: Playing with RB's new experimental night rules |
|
|
| weedsrock2 wrote: | Our gaming club had 12 people show up for our monthly WaS game night last Friday. Wow! We had pre-announced that the games would be using RB's new experimental night rules. So we played a total of about 14 games using those rules. Plus at least one player playtested in advance. Overall, they worked pretty well but there were a few glitches.
The biggest 'glitch' was predetermining that we were going to use darkness rules. Because we knew darkness rules were in effect we all came with builds optimized for that. But in RB's rules we should technically have rolled a dice to determine if darkness rules were in effect. That allowed a few things to become pretty serious 'cheese.' We also restricted the (200 pt) games to the European theater which also had a bad side effect.
The biggest problem was the Sparviero. By knowing in advance that night rules were in effect and by restricting to the European theatre there was really no effective counter-balance to these bombers. Fighters are almost useless because they rarely 'find' the target and also crash on landing (a few people tried it) so the only counter is ship-based AA, and that is hobbled by a -1. Add that to the Sparviero's 5 armor and they ran wild and free all over the game and were virtually impossible to stop.
If we had used the 'roll a dice to determine night rules' there probably would have been more 'hedging' in fleet builds to have more aircraft in the builds, but with the ability to swap out 25% of your points it is still likely the Sparviero's would rule the game. I also tried a couple of Halifax's. They did about the same as day rules since they already only hit on 6's (which is to say mediocre), but they are also almost impossible to shoot down. They also can't attack destroyers or PT boats (see next).
One thing that is probably an 'accurate' and positive change is the utility of MTB/PT boats. They are harder to hit at distance, and their torpedo attacks are not affected 'in sector' so they get a better chance to do some damage. Almost everyone brought MTB/PT's in their builds.
Overall, the surface gunnery rules seem to work fine, but I think the aircraft rules still need some work. Patrol bombers are too powerful and almost impossible to shoot down, or even abort. One possibility is to require patrol bombers to also do a 'search check' to tone them down. They could still land without a recovery check. Or maybe patrol bombers only fail a search check or recovery check on a '1'? Or maybe Sparviero's shouldn't be able to operate with night rules!  |
Man I need to get outta this hell hole. You have a regular gameing group? I'm jealous. _________________ Rapier $350, Armor $200,1500's Garb $150,Mask $100,Beating the crap out of your friends for fun!-PRICELESS!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
weedsrock2 .


AHF Bronze-Rated Trader
Joined: 23 Dec 2007 Posts: 1147
 Location: IA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:23 pm Post subject: Re: Playing with RB's new experimental night rules |
|
|
| cealigh wrote: | | weedsrock2 wrote: | | Our gaming club had 12 people show up for our monthly WaS game night last Friday. Wow! |
Man I need to get outta this hell hole. You have a regular gameing group? I'm jealous. |
It was great! About five or six of us have been playing Mechwarrior together for about five years. But we always struggled with getting more than six in the group, and we often only had two or three show up. Since we started playing WaS we have been steadily growing. We were all in 'shock and awe' Friday night when 12 people showed up and we had to lay out six maps. And we actually have 14 people overall in the 'pool.'
Swarbs moved to Iowa last summer and we just had a nine-year-old show up with his dad. That boy had ship fever! It was nice to see him so excited and have so much fun. (I won't mention that his dad defeated me.)
Those little ships are just too cool for school.
You can always join our group 'in spirit' and buy an "Iowa Shipbuilding and Drydock' t-shirt.  _________________
The IJN Carrier Liberation Force - "Because We Care"
Join the IJNCVLF. Service Guarantees Citizenship! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
weedsrock2 .


AHF Bronze-Rated Trader
Joined: 23 Dec 2007 Posts: 1147
 Location: IA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RTBS wrote: | Weedsrock - As we play historical limits, there's only one Eugenio I believe, so only one Koln can reach an objective on first turn. In our games anyway. Still, it would have been interesting to see how well it would have worked at night. If you had S-Boats to deny one objective, could use a Koln to get one on first turn. Then your opponent would pretty much be fighting for his life over the last one.
My Axis fleet had a flotilla leader bonus and plenty of destroyers. As most folk brought Battleships and very few of the Non-US Allied ships have a flag bonus, I had initiative very time in every game I played. And being able to get those destroyers in close against the BBs to use the Valiant Stand SA of the Ludeman's was nice. And I found having initiative every time made it easier to put my U-boats where I could do the most damage.
I would agree though that the Patrol Bombers are too powerful. I did not bring Sparvs, but I think you'd agree with me that even the Kondors were too powerful. I was able to fly two every turn, got four rocket attacks during the game, was able to harrass any sub I wanted pretty much, and as pinpointers for my U-Boats, I was rolling a lot of torpedoes. There were no penalties (except for ASW) and the only guy I played out of three games who had anything that could counter them ended up losing 2 of his three fighters and only got to attack one Kondor once (he only aborted).
In retrospect, my Axis build was probably of the "Cheesy" variety you refer to. Oh well. Playing the "It might be dark, it might not be dark" rule would probably eliminate that. At least from the Kondor side of things as they don't defend well against fighters. The Sparvs though, as you mention, would still be an issue. |
I forgot about those Kondor's whomping on me in our last game. You are right that they are not as bad as the Sparviero's. But your post suddenly made me realize it really doesn't make sense that any 'spotting' SA would work at night. _________________
The IJN Carrier Liberation Force - "Because We Care"
Join the IJNCVLF. Service Guarantees Citizenship! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IJN Fuso

Joined: 03 Feb 2008 Posts: 2189

|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can you post a link to the night rules you were using? _________________ TimK
IJN FUSO
www.modelwarshipcombat.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
weedsrock2 .


AHF Bronze-Rated Trader
Joined: 23 Dec 2007 Posts: 1147
 Location: IA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| IJN Fuso wrote: | | Can you post a link to the night rules you were using? |
RB's post on the Gleemax board:
http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?t=1089269 _________________
The IJN Carrier Liberation Force - "Because We Care"
Join the IJNCVLF. Service Guarantees Citizenship! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
weedsrock2 .


AHF Bronze-Rated Trader
Joined: 23 Dec 2007 Posts: 1147
 Location: IA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RTBS wrote: | | Weedsrock - As we play historical limits, there's only one Eugenio I believe, so only one Koln can reach an objective on first turn. In our games anyway. Still, it would have been interesting to see how well it would have worked at night. |
Actually, we all agreed to play historical limits by class not by named ship. So we can 'legally' play two Eugenio's (Duca D'Aosta class). _________________
The IJN Carrier Liberation Force - "Because We Care"
Join the IJNCVLF. Service Guarantees Citizenship! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IJN Fuso

Joined: 03 Feb 2008 Posts: 2189

|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Weeds. - that helps.
After reading those rules, I'd agree with you that the aircraft rules might need a little bit of tweaking for playability. My suggestions are not really historically accurate though:
I'd add a Patrol Bomber Search Check - maybe on 3+ vs 4+ for other aircraft.
Off the top of my head - I'd change the aircraft recovery rules
For land based planes - destroy on 1, Additional rearming counter on 2
For carrier based planes - destroy on 1,2, rearming counter on 3
For patrol bombers, additional rearming counter on 1
These might be worth a test.
Also - I like rolling a die to determine - if a 1,2 is rolled, its night and you get to exchange 25% points for new units. _________________ TimK
IJN FUSO
www.modelwarshipcombat.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
weedsrock2 .


AHF Bronze-Rated Trader
Joined: 23 Dec 2007 Posts: 1147
 Location: IA
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| IJN Fuso wrote: | Thanks Weeds. - that helps.
After reading those rules, I'd agree with you that the aircraft rules might need a little bit of tweaking for playability. My suggestions are not really historically accurate though:
I'd add a Patrol Bomber Search Check - maybe on 3+ vs 4+ for other aircraft.
Off the top of my head - I'd change the aircraft recovery rules
For land based planes - destroy on 1, Additional rearming counter on 2
For carrier based planes - destroy on 1,2, rearming counter on 3
For patrol bombers, additional rearming counter on 1
These might be worth a test.
Also - I like rolling a die to determine - if a 1,2 is rolled, its night and you get to exchange 25% points for new units. |
I agree those are the kinds of changes that need to be playtested. I already posted to RB that he needed to change the '25 pts' to '25%' of points. That is an artifact of their continued mindset to think in terms of 100 pt games. _________________
The IJN Carrier Liberation Force - "Because We Care"
Join the IJNCVLF. Service Guarantees Citizenship! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
| Random Image |
 |
|